The Perspective on Work from Home

By Chaya Benyamin
 Getty/ Tom Shaw / Staff
If you commute to work in a large city, chances are you’ve experienced a moment of jealously over the bespectacled freelancer sitting in a café, sipping cappuccino as she clicks away on her laptop keyboard. Work from home boasts impressive benefits: professional autonomy, greater work-life balance, low-stress environment.
With the decay of traditional work structures wherein workers were meant to have lifelong careers at one company or organization, the advent of the internet has ushered in a new economy, where workers increasingly prefer work at home opportunities to 9 to 5s. Nearly 40% of today’s workforce telecommutes(work from home and connects via a digital means), and the world’s top-rated companies for employees are embracing the trend with flexible schedules and telecommuting options.
But is work from home really all it’s cracked up to be? Let’s explore some of the advantages and drawbacks of work from home.




Work at home blurs the line between personal and professional life.

For a workaholic, work from home is roughly equivalent to conducting an AA meeting in a distillery – the tools to feed your addiction are precariously close by. And those who are not addicted to work still admit difficulty in drawing boundaries between work time and personal time. Conversely, other telecommuters are unable to snap out of “personal mode” when working from home. Those who dream of working in their pajamas often meet the fretful reality that they were as productive in their waking hours as they were in their sleep.  Work at home is simply not suitable to all personality types.

Independent work from homers suffer an endemic lack of security.

Traditional employment was at one time the cornerstone of a secure future for most Americans: companies and organizations provided health insurance programs and retirement plans which were, for the most part, financed by the employer. When workers step away from traditional employment, their “buying power” with respect to health and retirement plans decreases significantly. In addition, freelancers, who comprise the largest segment of telecommuters, are not protected by labor laws. Unlike traditional workers, they are not entitled to overtime pay, minimum wage, or worker’s compensation, or even antidiscrimination protections.

Work from home contributes to professional stagnation.

A study from MIT’s Sloan Business School confirms the adage “out of sight, out of mind” is the governing wisdom that gets people ahead, or keeps them in place, at work. The study shows that presence and productivity seem to be inextricably linked in the human psyche, even if there is no actual correlation between presence and output (most businesses rely on subjective reviews over performance data). Simply put, telecommuters are less likely to receive positive performance reviews or receive raises and promotions. Freelance telecommuters have the added challenge of establishing the brand recognition, visibility, and consumer trust that would allow for expansion or the leverage to demand higher compensation. Furthermore, freelancers incur both time and monetary costs of professional development, making such endeavors less appealing, especially without the same guarantee of advancement that professional development offers in traditional employment.




Work from home increases worker productivity.

91% of telecommuting employees surveyed reported that they believe they are more productive at home than in the office. Data from a Stanford study that monitored call center employees who worked work from home revealed that this impression is not baseless: employees who worked from home answered 13.5 percent more phone calls than their office-bound counterparts. Homes are largely devoid of typical workplace distractions, engendering deeper concentration for workers and increases in overall productivity for those who employ them.

Work from home is economical for individuals and companies alike.

For individuals, working from home means significant savings in transportation costs like gas and automobile upkeep and access to cheap (and arguably, healthier) food from their own kitchens. Time economy for telecommuters is also a distinct advantage – hours not spent commuting can be applied to work, household upkeep or even exercise or sleep. Work from home opportunities increase overall household incomes by providing opportunities for individuals who are not able to arrive to traditional jobs, like parents with young children, retirees, and the disabled. Companies who employ telecommuters save money on real estate, utilities, training, and work from home arrangements have even been proven to encourage employee retention.

Work from home increases the value of work.

The gig economy has been particularly useful in connecting talent from around the world to jobs. Freelance platforms like Fiverr and SimplyHired allow freelancers across the globe to network with service seekers and set their own prices, in many cases allowing them to exceed the price they could ask in their local market. A freelancer from India doing business with a company from England need not be confined to the value his service or product might garner in his local market. As such, in the long-term, telecommuting might prove a valuable tool for standardizing the value of labor across markets. The growth of the freelancer market might also counter wage stagnation by increasing demand for traditional workers in fixed positions.

Bottom lines: It’s easy to take a romantic view of working from home – prioritizing flexibility for a greater work life-balance. In reality though, both corporate and independent telecommuters make substantial trade-offs for this flexibility . Whether autonomy is truly worthwhile is a judgement to be made by each individual, though, preferably before quitting one’s day job. So where is your next career move taking place?

Write a response...
See what else you’re missing