In 2017, the U.S. women’s hockey team decided to sit out the International Ice Hockey Federation World Championship in Michigan, in protest of the unfair discrimination between sexes. This protest has once again sparked the subject of gender inequality in sports, questioning everything from the gender wage gap between sports teams to whether or not sports should be gender-segregated at all.
Here are three reasons why women should be allowed to compete against men in professional sports, and three reasons why they shouldn’t.
Women should compete against men in sports:
The physicality argument is not valid for all sports
Sports are not all about physicality. Some sports highlight physical aspects while others highlight skills. Take tennis for example: Players who are stronger and more physically adept hold an advantage in some areas of the game, but players who are more talented skill-wise are better overall. Roger Federer, for example, isn’t the most physical tennis player, but he is probably the best player out there. Also, nobody who has ever watched Serena Williams play tennis can deny that sheer skill is what has won her 23 Grand Slam titles (although her muscles definitely help).
While men and women may differ in physicality, they do not differ in their skills capacity. In sports – where the importance of skills outweighs the importance of physicality – everyone should compete equally.
Let nature do its thing
Women should be allowed to compete against men since, like in men’s sports, only women who are good enough will be drafted and will play. That’s just the nature of competitive sports. It’s the “natural selection” mechanism of sports that leaves the bad players out, regardless of their gender, physicality, race or religion.
It’s society’s duty to stop segregation in sports
The socialization of boys and girls with regards to sports sports differs in so many ways; they’re often funneled into different directions, and their different abilities are heightened before biology makes its first mark. This is a result of historical prejudice and of centuries of discrimination, which shouldn’t be part of modern society.
Sports are a cultural institution. They are known to be catalysts of social trends and movements. As long as we agree with this prejudice casting, we take part in reinforcing it. Our society must not put up with it anymore. It’s not just about sports; it’s about how we view and value one another.
Women shouldn’t compete against men:
There won’t be a level playing field
What makes sports so popular is “the sweet tension of uncertainty of outcome,” in the words of Warren Fraleigh, a professor of physical education. Involving women in certain sports could break this tension. In short runs, even the most talented women are at a disadvantage when competing against the average male athlete. This is due to reasons such as differences in muscle mass, innate strength, testosterone levels or socially constructed gender differences.
Allowing women to compete with men in such sports would be like allowing a 120-pound boxer to get in the ring with a 250-pound boxer; it’s not fair, and fans won’t enjoy it. Imagine that the Super Bowl winner were to be known before the season starts; the NFL simply wouldn’t be as popular. If women were to compete against men, men would have an unfair disadvantage from the beginning; the winner would most likely be decided before the competition even began. Where’s the sport in that?
Women won’t catch up to men
There is a serious claim that once women will be allowed to compete with men, they will eventually catch up to men in terms of ability and performance. Allowing women to compete against men could inspire a huge leap in their abilities, and most of the American public believes that top female athletes will eventually beat top males.
Yet this claim overlooks important aspects: First, men’s sports will make a leap at the same time as women’s, making it harder for women to catch up. Second, and most importantly, the performance gap between the sexes is just too wide (between 8-12%), a gap that is impossible for women to bridge. The top women in 100m sprints and long jump still lag around 10% behind their male counterparts. Additionally women’s best scores in swimming or athletics don’t even reach the top 400 men’s scores. While women’s physical abilities will likely advance and the performance gap will get narrower, it is highly unlikely to disappear altogether – putting men at an unfair advantage.
The change in sports may not be welcomed
It has been claimed that “if new weight and length classes are introduced in many sports [and] if the rules are changed,” women will be able to compete against men and win in several sports. Essentially, some feel it may be worth considering changing the games so that they accommodate women. However, it`s hard to believe that the American public would want their favorite sports to change.
When the NFL launched the “Concussion Protocol” in order to save players’ lives, fans didn’t like that, and claimed this change would ruin football. Additionally, fans were aggravated by the MLB’s ban on home plate collision, and they still have issues with instant replay being used to make better judgment calls. In this vein, any change in sports that is made to accommodate women will likely see strong opposition by fans.
Bottom lines: While women competing against men in professional sports would be a positive win against gender discrimination, it would reduce the uncertainty of outcomes and potentially change the games the world has already come to know and love. What do you think? Would you want to see women and men competing against one another?