Major League Baseball’s (MLB) concept of the designated hitter is one of professional sports’ longest-running debates. The rule allows teams to have one player, known as the designated hitter (DH), to bat in place of the pitcher. In 1973, one of the MLB’s two divisions, the American League, adopted the rule, while its counterpart, the National League, rejected it. Ever since, this rule has been under debate. Some suggest applying it to both leagues and others recommend dropping it altogether.
Here are three arguments for the removal of the DH rule and three arguments for keeping it.
Why MLB should get rid of Designated Hitters:
The DH takes away opportunities from younger players
The DH allows older players to extend their careers, especially those who have a history of injuries or whose defensive abilities as fielders have eroded. However, it simultaneously prevents new, younger players from developing their MLB careers. As the batting spots are taken by overpaid older players, who only bat and never take the field, talented young hitters yearning for an opportunity to display their batting abilities don’t get the chance to do so. The American League has most likely lost some talented players because of DH.
The DH era is ending
A look into the MLB proves that baseball is going in a direction where DHs will no longer be needed. Current and Pitchers like Madison Bumgarner and Noah Syndergaard (among others) have the ability to bat well, and their stats prove that they don’t need a DH.
Also, nowadays, players are expected to be more versatile and to bring value to both the field and behind the bat. Accordingly, there are fewer and fewer DHs in the league. David Ortiz, who may be the most prominent representative of the DH era, has retired, and around half of the full-time DHs in the league are over 35 and will retire soon.
The DH ruins part of the game`s lure
Seeing a pitcher bat is part of professional baseball’s lure. Yes, pitchers aren’t the best batters the game has to offer, which is exactly why seeing them step up to the plate is interesting. It spices up the game, and offers the potential for surprise, which is a big part of what makes baseball so special.
Why MLB should keep Designated Hitters:
Different is good
During the years, the difference in the DH rules between the American League (where the DH was adopted) and the National League has created a different style of the game in both leagues. American League baseball is more offense oriented; it`s a power game whose main strategy is to get runners on base and then have a batter hit a three-run home run. In contrast, the focus of National League baseball is not on home runs but on pitching and speed.
This difference is great. It differentiates the leagues, and gives them separate and unique identities. As LA Angels general manager Billy Eppler once said to ESPN: “The qualities of each league are part of that (baseball) character.”
For the fans
Keeping the DH rule will make MLB more entertaining. Since most pitchers are below-average batters, using a DH increases offense, which the stats have long proven. For example, in 2015, the American League runs-per-game average was 4.39, in comparison to a 4.11 in the National League.
Defense is crucial for winning baseball games, and pitching is an important aspect of defense. That being said, without offense, no team can win games. Most fans enjoy watching baseball hitters score more than defensive plays; for many, offensive games canbe more exciting to watch. Therefore, keeping the DH in the American League and expanding it to the National League will increase the amount of good hitters at bat, thus making MLB more more appealing for fans.
Specialized players is part of most sports
Designated players are common in most team sports. In NFL football, there`s an offensive team and defensive team; some NBA basketball players specialize in shooting, rebounding or defending; and in hockey, the NHL has enforcers. So, MLB’s DH is common practice.
Also, unlike in the NBA and the NFL, in MLB, a coach can bring a substituted player back into the field. Therefore, it is acceptable to allow one player to play for another for only a few moves during a game, as a DH does. Denying the use of a DH is much like forcing a football coach to play his QB in defense.
The Bottom Line: There are many arguments for why MLB should drop or expand the role of Designated Hitters. Do you prefer or avoid watching games that include Designated Hitters?