THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY

Should we question the motives of celebrity activists?

Celebrity activism is effective

Celebrity activism isn't effective

 Getty Images: Handout

Celebrity activism is effective and can make a real difference. Whether its appealing to the U.S. senate to push for legislation, funding non-profit organizations, or leading or participating in boycotts, celebrities are able to leverage their popularity and fan base to promote global awareness for important social causes that might otherwise never get off the ground.  Francis Maxwell writes in the Huffington Post that such celebrity activists should not have to apologize for or defend their beliefs and efforts to further their cause to critics. After all, their actions are making a positive difference around the world.

Keep on reading at The Huffington Post

Celebrity activism is not effective and does more harm than good. While celebrities may be very good intentioned in taking up a cause and pushing for policy changes, there are often unintended consequences, writes Georgia Cole, Ben Radley and Jean Benoit-Falisse in The Guardian. These celebrities don't necessarily know how to transfer their ideals into practical, beneficial solutions, which leaves the people they are trying to help vulnerable and in harm's way when strategies aren't implemented correctly. Plus, having a cause gives them access to more media outlets and audiences to further their own brands

Keep on reading at The Guardian
83.3%
Where do you stand?
16.7%
Play
Who Is This Celebrity?
Want to play?

SHOW COMMENTS
Write a response...
See what else you’re missing
single