THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY

Is it morally correct for Dylann Roof to be executed?

Roof's instability shouldn't warrant death

He accepted the consequences of his crime

 Getty: Pool / Pool

Dylann Roof should not have had the right to fire his lawyers when they wanted to present evidence of his mental instability, and he should not be executed, write Frank R. Baumgartner and Betsy Neill of the Washington Post. Their research found a significant prevalence of mental illness among prisoners that were executed. The American justice system should not seek to execute those who are mentally unstable, including Roof, they infer. His desire to represent himself and dismiss mental incompetence as an excuse mirrors many past executed inmates' desire for suicide by execution, suggest Baumgartner and Neill.

Keep on reading at the Washington Post

To shed light on a different perspective on the morality of executing Dylann Roof, we looked at Andrew Cohen’s January NBC News article. According to Cohen, Dylann Roof’s decision to take full responsibility for his actions and not blame mental instability, which will likely result in him being executed, should be respected. Roof chose to be his own lawyer, profess his mental aptitude, and not present any mitigating evidence in his trial. Cohen argues that we should respect that choice and allow Roof the path to the death penalty. Roof understood what awaits him and seems to embrace any punishment he faces for his actions, believes Cohen.

Keep on reading at NBC News
10.0%
Where do you stand?
90.0%
SHOW COMMENTS
Write a response...
See what else you’re missing
single
modal image