THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY

Would the US be better off without Sessions?

Sessions has been harmful and should go

He has significantly improved the country

 Getty: Chip Somodevilla / Staff

If Trump chooses to fire Jeff Sessions he will halt his damaging policies, while incriminating himself further, argues Trevor Timm of the Guardian. The decision to do so could give special prosecutor Mueller more ammunition over Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia. Crucially though, Sessions has introduced a harmful drug-enforcement campaign, backed excessive immigration policies and removing essential freedoms such as those of whistleblowers. Few candidates for attorney general could outdo Sessions in depressing Americans. Either way, firing him would slow down his policies, giving Democrats valuable time to counter them.

Keep on reading at the Guardian

Jeff Sessions is the best attorney general the American people and the president could have asked for, holds Katherine Robertson of National Review. He proved his integrity and thorough devotion to following the law when he recused himself from the Russia investigation. The attorney general is a positive influence on both Trump’s cabinet and the Justice department. He has spread justice, punishing sanctuary cities, violent crime and illegal immigrants, while contributing to the improvement of America’s healthcare system. Sessions is a pillar of stability and democracy. He is a big asset to the country as a whole.

Keep on reading at Conservative Review
20.0%
Where do you stand?
80.0%
SHOW COMMENTS
Write a response...
See what else you’re missing
single
modal image