From Ghandi’s Salt March to the downfall of a regime in some Baltic state to the recent March for Our Lives protesting America’s lack of gun control, humanity buzzes with protest movements every year. And while nothing captivates like a crowd, a comparison of the number of protests held yearly to governmental or society changes suggests that the actual success rate of this cornerstone of non-violent resistance is, in fact, rather low. This begs the question: Do protests work?
Here are three reasons why protests are effective, and three reasons they are not.
Say it loud, say it proud.
Protests bring socially and economically marginalized groups to the foreground.
Coal miners are unlikely champions of protest movements. As global economies began shifting away from coal, miners suffered from downsizing, colliery closures, and loss of benefits. In the US and UK, miners used protests to bring their struggles to the public – and won. Most recently, coal workers of the China’s Longmay coal firm prompted the government to admit financial struggles and demand back payment of thousands of workers. Additionally, the Occupy Wall Street movement has been similarly effective in giving America’s lower income bracket a voice, shedding light on the growing chasm between the top 1% of American earners and the rest of the nation.
Protests promote solidarity.
Protests are not merely coalitions of the aggrieved, but are more correctly understood as an expression of a shared fate. The Women’s March on Washington, Standing Rock protests, and continuous pro-Immigration protests enjoyed participation of individuals who are unaffected by the core grievances of women, Native Americans, and immigrants. Why? Because people’s identities are governed as much by their values as they are by their color, class, and education. Protests offer the opportunities to use values as their main identifiers, allowing for greater identification across diverse groups. Perhaps no protest addresses this appeal to intersectionality as the Women’s March on Washington, whose expansive platform drew an estimated one million participants from 670 protest events across the country – likely the largest protest in history.
Protests produce results.
Protests have been shown to exert influence over politics. Serbians ousted a dictator through nonviolent resistance, and Egyptians followed in kind ten years later. In recent American politics, the grassroots protests that sprung up at American airports in reaction to Trump’s executive order barring refugees and citizens of several Muslim-majority countries from entering the US might be credited for prompting swift legal action that allowed many visa-holders to remain in the country. Also, teachers throughout West Virginia recently went on strike during a nine-day protest that resulted in, among other demands, a 5% increase in pay; additional teacher strikes in other states are now following. It may be too soon to tell the final outcome, but the teenage survivors of the Parkland high school shooting have created a national discussion and movement that is holding government officials and businesses accountable when it comes to measures that would increase responsible gun control.
Don’t waste your energy.
Protests hardly ever achieve their ends.
Protests aren’t as effective as demonstrators like to think. As you read these words, hundreds of protests are taking place across the United States, with thousands more being staged across the world. Most of these efforts will pass without remark, revealing the miniscule impact of protests in general. A Princeton study found that public opinion hardly comes to bear on legislation, and the results of most protests confirms this. The anti-war movement against US military involvement in Vietnam that was popularized on college campuses in 1965 had no effect on war activities, which were in fact ramped up until the war’s end in 1973. Protests in the US and the UK against the Iraq war did nothing to curb the invasion. The Women’s Day March of 2016 was even confronted by results that ran counter to their goal of ensuring reproductive rights for women worldwide. Just two days after the protest, President Trump signed an executive order stripping US aid from foreign institutions that offer abortion services, and further rollbacks on reproductive rights in the domestic arena are expected to follow.
Protests alone do not achieve change.
Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech bookended the Civil Rights Movement’s march on Washington, yet the march itself cannot be credited for the civil rights legislation that followed it. Protest was just one part of a layered nonviolent resistance tactic employed by the movement for a decade before any legislation was signed. Protests can win exposure for a cause, but they do not fight legal battles that make change possible. Consider the recent Standing Rock protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline. While media attention may have hastened legal decisions on the matter of building on Sioux lands, the final battle was ultimately decided in the Oval Office and in the courtroom, and the protest lines were swiftly shut down.
Protests are win-lose propositions that highlight ideological differences and sow discord.
The ethos of protest is rooted in conflict, not conflict resolution – resistance, even nonviolent resistance, is an act of war intended to change a political reality. Protest rhetoric is more about preaching to the choir than it is about changing hearts and minds. The one-voice-no-debate approach is a zero-sum game that pits protesters against their environment, and to an extent, against anyone who is not protesting. This charged atmosphere often leads to violence that proves counterproductive to protest goals. For example, Antifa protestors and their embrace of violence tend to undermine their aims of fighting against fascism. This light being shone on the (mis)actions of the extreme left lessens the focus on or impact of the extreme right, and widens national discord, as was shown after Charlottesville.
Bottom Lines: While protests can do much to direct attention toward issues, attention is not necessarily all that is required to affect change. Do you believe in change? How do you think we should bring it about?