THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY

Should Steve Bannon be on the National Security Council?

Steve Bannon should be on the N.S.C.

Steve Bannon shouldn't be on the N.S.C.

 Getty Images: Pool

Adding Stephen K. Bannon, President Trump's top political advisor, to the National Security Council is a good decision. The council is tasked with discussing and analyzing matters of foreign policy and providing the president with national security recommendations. Therefore, argues Justin Holcomb of Townhall, giving Trump's most trusted and like-minded advisor a seat at the table will help the president make more informed security decisions.

Keep on reading at Townhall

Having Stephen K. Bannon as a voting member of the White House's National Security Council is a bad decision with negative consequences.  The council is intended to be a non-political forum where federal agencies discuss and debate national security issues before providing counsel to the U.S. president. Michael Mullen writes in the New York Times that as a voting member, Bannon will negatively influence what's supposed to be nonpartisan discussions.

Keep on reading at The New York Times
83.3%
Where do you stand?
16.7%
Play
What Position Would You Have In The US Government?
Want to play?

SHOW COMMENTS
Write a response...
See what else you’re missing
single
modal image